Session 2 · October 2026
Subject deep dive · ELA
45 minutesWriting-heavy subjects
Goal
Each teacher redesigns one writing assignment so that AI use is visible and instructive instead of a threat, and walks out with the redesigned assignment ready to use.
Prep
- Claude / Cowork open on the projector.
- One short student-style paragraph you can have AI write live (for the critique demo).
- Shared doc for teachers to draft their redesigned assignment.
- Ask teachers to bring one writing assignment they already give.
0:00 — 0:05
Open · the honest worry
Do Quick poll: "Since September, how often have you gotten a piece of writing you suspected was AI?" Name the worry out loud, don't dismiss it.
Say "Every student now has a competent ghostwriter in their pocket. We're not going to out-detect it. We're going to teach around it."
0:05 — 0:20
Focus · writing instruction that AI can't shortcut
Three concrete moves, each demoed briefly:
- Critique the AI's draft. Have AI write a mediocre paragraph live, then show how you'd have students improve and critique it. This teaches analysis and revision, and it's the same skill whether the draft is theirs or a machine's.
- Make the process visible. Assignments built on drafts, conferencing, in-class writing, and reflection make outsourced final products pointless, because the grade lives in the process, not the polished artifact.
- Voice. Put a student's real sentence next to AI's generic version and name the difference. Students protecting their own voice is a stronger motivator than any rule.
Watch Don't sell AI-detectors. Say plainly they're unreliable and can falsely accuse, especially multilingual students. The strategy is instructional design, not surveillance.
0:20 — 0:35
Hands-on · redesign one assignment (laptops open)
Each teacher takes one writing assignment they brought and rebuilds it into an "AI-aware" version, choosing at least one of:
- A critique-the-AI component — students receive an AI-written draft and improve/critique it as part of the task.
- A visible-process component — a required draft, a conference, or an in-class writing portion, plus the disclosure line from September.
- A protected version — convert the highest-stakes piece to an in-class, AI-free assessment.
Do Teachers draft the redesigned assignment in the shared doc. Non-ELA teachers adapt to any writing they assign (lab write-ups, DBQs, reflections). Pairs swap and sharpen.
Watch Push for one finished redesign, not a list of ideas. The win is something they can assign next week.
0:35 — 0:45
Share-out + commit
Do Two or three teachers show their redesign. Commitment: run it this month and note what happened. Preview: November is Math, where AI is confidently wrong about numbers.
After the session
- Post the shared doc of redesigned assignments as a starter bank; tag strong ones for the showcase.